Wake Up, America. We're Driving Toward Disaster Essay

Wake Up, America. Were Driving Toward Disaster - Essay ExampleThe incendiary nature of the word does not have a concrete payoff at the end. From the beginning of the article, Kunstler establishes his credibility in utter on the topic that he chooses to address. He begins his discussion with the words Everywhere I go these days, lecture to the highest degree the global cypher predicament on the college lecture circuit or at environmental conferences, thus without knowing anything just about the homophile or his credentials, the lecturer is given the impression that this is a man whose opinion is valued enough to attract university level attention. He has established a sense of ethos from the starting line through the use of an aspect of his career that relates to the topic he is addressing. He then continues, in this start paragraph, to grab the attention of the reader by suggesting that the rallying cry that is most often heard about the topic of energy, that of solutions, is not the focus that should be taken by the American public. In these two first gear sentences, Kunstler has established a sense of his own expertise and engaged the reader through challenging a preconceived idea that has framed a great deal of the discussion on energy consumption. The succeeding(prenominal) section of Kunstlers article specifically states his position on the topic. He states, We have to make former(a) arrangements, thus establishing his viewpoint on the idea of how to approach the problem of energy consumption. He first states the ship mode in which energy consumption is being abused and infers that a willingingingness to sacrifice those abuses of energy is the only way in which to realistically approach the nature of the problem. An assumption is made, after his point is made, that the public does not translate the consequences of ignoring the energy problem and this ignorance puts into jeopardy every aspect of American life that is concerned with survival. He engages the audience through discussing their needs through the concept of the threat to those needs. Kunstler further explains the problem when he says Its about the instabilities that will shake the complex systems of daily life as soon as the global contend for oil exceeds the global supply. This section of the work does two things in the pursuit to convince the reader to believe in Kunstlers point of view. He insults the trivial nature of the attitude of the American tenet in a lifestyle that includes a great deal of energy consumption, as well as then insulting the intelligence of the reader who has not thought far enough to realize that an energy problem will halt food, trade, travel, housing, and money, while throwing in governance, health care, and education to further draw in the reader so that they feel a threat that must be addressed through which his beliefs will clarify how the problem should be addressed. This type of rhetoric uses the force of fear in order to nominate context for the importance of the problem. Kunstler is telling the audience that if they do not swing towards his point of view they will lose everything that substantiates their way of life. He attaches his argument to their fear for survival, the need to protect and secure the future and to support the continuation of how they procure their basic needs. Once establishing that the future of survival is at risk, he supports this belief by giving a list of consequences that will occur if the use